妒火焚情

北京遇上西雅圖之不二情書(shū)

　　焦嬌（湯唯 飾）15歲就來(lái)到了澳門(mén)，過(guò)著顛沛流離的生活，之后成為了賭場(chǎng)公關(guān)。羅大牛（吳秀波 飾）早年來(lái)到美國(guó)，一番摸爬滾打，如今已經(jīng)是小有名氣的加州房地產(chǎn)經(jīng)紀(jì)人，事業(yè)一帆風(fēng)順的他在情場(chǎng)上自然步步為贏，是公認(rèn)的鉆石王老五。　　一本名為《查令十字街84號(hào)》的書(shū)讓這一對(duì)生活毫無(wú)交集的男女走到了一起，兩人通過(guò)電子郵件進(jìn)行交往，透過(guò)種種誤會(huì)和波折，最終發(fā)現(xiàn)彼此是自己的靈魂伴侶。在此期間，焦嬌徘徊在鄭義（陸毅 飾）、鄧先生（王志文 飾）和詩(shī)人（祖峰 飾）之間不知何去何從，而羅大牛則在同華裔老夫妻林平生（秦沛 飾）和唐秀懿（吳彥姝 飾）的交往當(dāng)中逐漸發(fā)現(xiàn)了人生的道義。

狂野時(shí)代

　　影片講述“迷魂者”（易烊千璽 飾）通過(guò)體驗(yàn)視覺(jué)、聽(tīng)覺(jué)、味覺(jué)、嗅覺(jué)、觸覺(jué)五感，跨越一個(gè)世紀(jì)的故事。而“大她者”（舒淇 飾）則好似是打開(kāi)“迷魂者”故事的鑰匙......

四面三角

新的景色

高野任職園境建筑師，規(guī)劃澀谷宮下公園重建；露宿者被驅(qū)趕，讓路予結(jié)合戶(hù)外休憩與購(gòu)物商場(chǎng)的新地標(biāo)。為了工作犧牲家庭，大刀闊斧改造都市面貌，自己卻家破人亡了。十年后，一盆蝴蝶蘭令父子重遇，女兒已不再在乎長(zhǎng)期缺席的父親。重回故地，親子關(guān)系能否重建？團(tuán)冢唯我首部長(zhǎng)片，善用建筑空間顯現(xiàn)家庭創(chuàng)傷，靜謐中蘊(yùn)藏情感波動(dòng)，再以破碎燈泡讓記憶回魂。被離棄的世代游走于冷漠城市，重新審視家人之間的距離之余，亦察看一座城市于急速變形下殘留的空洞。

孔雀鎮(zhèn)

　　在孔雀鎮(zhèn)的鐵路旁邊，生活著一個(gè)有著灰暗過(guò)去的男子——約翰·斯基爾帕（希里安·墨菲 Cillian Murphy 飾），他自幼在母親的淫威下長(zhǎng)大，由此養(yǎng)成了壓抑自閉的性格。在母親去世后，約翰的人格分裂，其內(nèi)心生出象征母性的女子埃瑪。約翰就這樣在男女兩個(gè)身份間轉(zhuǎn)換，過(guò)著平靜而扭曲的隱蔽生活?！　∧硞€(gè)清晨，災(zāi)禍突然降臨。一個(gè)火車(chē)頭脫軌闖入約翰家的院子，正在晾曬衣物的?，斒艿襟@嚇，并且出現(xiàn)在小鎮(zhèn)人民的面前。人們對(duì)此議論紛紛，約翰則希望盡快將火車(chē)頭清除院子，然而政客們卻打算以此作為政治斗爭(zhēng)的砝碼。面對(duì)種種混亂的局面，約翰和埃瑪?shù)男闹薪箲]重重，他們的矛盾也漸次激化……

復(fù)仇雙雄

故事圍繞墨西哥特種部隊(duì)精英卡洛斯（綽號(hào)“公牛”）展開(kāi)，他在一次任務(wù)中成功抓獲了犯罪集團(tuán)頭目，卻因此遭到報(bào)復(fù)，妻子在他面前被殘忍殺害，自己也淪為通緝犯。走投無(wú)路之際，他意外中了彩票頭獎(jiǎng)，一夜之間擁有了復(fù)仇的資本。他與摯友、戰(zhàn)友米格爾聯(lián)手，將全部財(cái)富轉(zhuǎn)化為武器和情報(bào)，從被通緝的逃犯，變成了以暴制暴的“復(fù)仇獵人”，目標(biāo)是讓所有參與殺害他妻子的人，付出最慘痛的代價(jià)。

等待方舟

　　Set in an underground dungeon inhabited by bundled, ragged human beings, after the nuclear holocaust. The story follows the wanderings of a hero through the situations of survival. People wait for the Ark to arrive and rescue them while their habitat falls apart.　　Delving deep into the dusty and long abandonded vaults of b-cinema in search of lost gems always leaves me with a bittersweet taste. On one hand the discovery of unexpected gems where no one would think them possible is a rewarding experience. On the other hand though it makes one wonder how many of these remarkable low-budget oddities, personal love affairs of directors never quite famous and now all but forgotten, have almost forever slipped from memory?　　n any case what we have here is a little post-apocalyptic gem from Poland that is really better than it has any right to. The dystopian near future of O-BI, O-BA finds a group of survivors of the nuclear war that ravaged the Earth inhabiting an underworld concrete bunker and biding their time as they wait for the mysterious Ark, an air ship of some kind that will come and save them. The Ark proves to be an elaborate hoax, carefully designed to give hope to the malnourished and desperate denizens of the bunker, while in the meantime the dome that separates their miserable existence from the nuclear winter outside is slowly caving in.　　What first striked me about the movie is the design of the bunker and the depiction of the survivors. The survivors are gaunt, filthy and terrible-looking penitents, dressed in rags and aimlessly wandering the neon-lit halls of the bunker like automatons. The bunker is a rundown, seedy place, with bright neon lights peering from all sides like the eyes of malignant beasts.　　On one hand it is a slightly 80's depiction of the dystopian future but the movie never stoops down to MAD MAX cheese. Instead it combines biting political satire with the bleak outlook of a world with no future, black comedy with barbs on apathy, religion and power. The survivors, for example, are fed some kind of flour dropping from a tube that hovers in the air - later on we discover the food supervisor uses books and the Bible itself as filler for this meagre meal. There are many such short symbolic touches, perhaps not life-changing or faith-restoring, yet playful, clever and inspired.　　One thing is for sure; O-BI, O-BA is not your run-of-the-mill sci-fi schlock. It overcomes its modest budget with creativity and has genuine artistic aspirations both from a writing and directing perspective. My opinion is that it should have been filmed in black and white instead of colour though. The director uses atmospheric light and shadow to great effect and it would have registered even better in stark black and white. The blue-green neon on the other hand outstays its welcome after a while. Just a minor gripe in an otherwise solid b-movie with its heart set in all the right places.　　Imagine a less bleak THE ROAD (Cormac McCarthy) being injected with the satire and humour of DR.STRANGELOVE and you're getting there. See it if you can find it.