劇情縱覽
《馬庫巴性經》Macumba Sexual 西班牙傳奇色導Jess Franco1983年的一部,這老鴨嫩的拍過180多部情色片,用過幾十個化名....
《馬庫巴性經》Macumba Sexual 西班牙傳奇色導Jess Franco1983年的一部,這老鴨嫩的拍過180多部情色片,用過幾十個化名....
某座住宅區(qū),負責公寓內各項維修事務的菲恩(Matt O'Leary 飾)和約瑟(George Finn 飾)是一對窮的叮當響的好基友。某天菲恩的女友凱莉(Danielle Panabaker 飾)來到他們的住處,當?shù)弥≡诟舯诘呢愊壬呀浐荛L時間沒走出房門時,凱莉自告奮勇上門查看,結果卻一臉錯愕地回到二人面前。原來貝先生早已不見蹤影,房間內一面墻貼滿了以三個人為對象的拍立得照片,窗口則有一臺奇怪的機器正對著菲恩和約瑟的房間。不久后他們發(fā)現(xiàn),那臺機器竟是可以拍攝到未來情景的照相機。他們發(fā)現(xiàn)了貝先生的尸體,然而因為照相機的原因秘藏了此事?! o意間擁有了窺視未來的手段,年輕人們的心不知不覺躁動起來……
達武德從戰(zhàn)爭中歸來,發(fā)現(xiàn)他村里的每個人都死于一種奇怪的疾病并且已經腐爛。 他的妹妹是唯一的幸存者,也正在慢慢腐爛。 達武德被他作為一名士兵的記憶所困擾,因為他面臨著唯一真正的問題:生存和生活一樣嗎?
影片改編自Samuel D. Hunter創(chuàng)作的同名戲劇,講述在愛達荷州鄉(xiāng)村一個破舊的公寓里,重達272公斤的英語教師查理(布蘭登·費舍 飾)隱居避世,固執(zhí)、堅決地要把自己吃死。查理在中年時期為了同性情人拋棄家人,但情人過世后因為悲傷和內疚暴飲暴食,并且嘗試與17歲的女兒艾莉(薩迪·辛克 飾)修復關系。隨著查理越來越接近不可避免的命運,他的朋友麗茲(周洪 飾),一個憤世嫉俗的無神論者護士,以及埃爾德·托馬斯(泰·辛普金斯 飾),一個年輕的傳教士都試圖在查理身上找到能被拯救的意志,無論是肉體上還是精神上。然而,只有與查理關系疏遠的女兒艾莉才能讓他看到目前絕望狀態(tài)之外的未來,艾莉雖然尖酸刻薄、充滿仇恨、渾身是刺,查理卻能在她身上找到最后一次贖罪的機會,甚至可能是一絲希望。
Following her mother’s death, manga artist Soriya travels to her ancestral home in Phnom Penh, with hopes of reconnecting with her distant family and using the visit as inspiration for her work. All goes well initially. Renting an apartment in Metta, a rundown Khmer Rouge-era housing complex, her visit to her maternal relatives finds her welcomed with open arms. But Soriya’s waking hours in the apartment and its surroundings are punctuated by terrifying, bloody visions, almost as though she were a conduit for horrors of the past wanting to seep into the present. Inrasothythep Neth and Sokyou Chea’s blood-chilling psychological horror explores a personal and political past through the present, transforming a characterful space into an insidious environment. Surrounded by modern high-rises, this decrepit structure, with its brutalist architecture and peeling surfaces, is a relic from a dark period in history whose painful memories it has absorbed. In tracing Soriya’s ominous journey back to her roots, Tenement hints at a necessary reckoning with Cambodia’s political past without overplaying its historical dimension. It’s an impressive work from a woefully underrepresented national cinema.