VN.008 顧欣怡

評分:4.2 播放:00萬 更新:2026-04-25
主演: 未知

[嗲囡囡FEILIN]暫無內容暫無內容寫真集系列鑒賞

影片推薦

同類精選

影視排行

手遮天

劉峰超,袁福福,淳于珊珊

  底層捕快薛不疑(劉峰超 飾)因不諳世故遭同僚排擠,憋屈十年。一樁賑災銀盜竊案他淪為替罪羊。絕境中,他受老師黃士寧(淳于珊珊 飾)搭救,與師弟李震(袁福福 飾)再度合作,然而錢外有錢官外有官,他被迫成為高官手中的“犬牙”……在這黑暗世道,他是會選擇做一只聽話的鷹犬,還是掙脫這巨 手成為啄天之鷹?

昭和殘俠傳:血染的唐獅子

高倉健,藤純子,池部良,津川雅彥,曽根晴美,山城新伍,牧紀子,萩玲子

  昭和初期。淺草界隈の左官、大工をまとめ信望を一身に集める鳶政は、今は病身で、後取りの小頭の秀次郎が兵役から帰還してくるのを待っていた。そうした時、東京で博覧會が開かれることになり、會場が上野に決った。上野は鳶政の縄張りだったが、博徒阿久根一家が札束をつんで工事の利権を譲れと言ってきた。これを斷った鳶政は阿久津の子分三日仏に殺された。阿久津はその上、市の土木局長高見沢と結託し、鳶政傘下の業(yè)者を買収してしまった。そんなやり方に、阿久津の代貸し重吉とその妹文代は心を痛めていた。重吉は秀次郎とは親友だった。やがて秀次郎が帰ってきた。そして入札は無事に鳶政一家に落ち、會場建設の大工事が始った。そんな時、音吉が蕓者染次を身請けするため大切な纒を質屋の巖源に渡し、それが阿久津の手に渡るという事件が起った。音吉は責任を感じそれを取り返しに行って殺され、染次も阿久津に身を売る約束で纒を取返したが、音吉の後を追って死んだ。秀次郎たちは阿久津への激しい怒りに駆られたものの、今は工事の方が大切と會場建設に全力を注ぐのだった。しかし阿久津たちはそんな鳶政一家に次々と工事の妨害を仕かけてきた。それをじっと耐えていた秀次郎たちだったが、工事現(xiàn)場に放火された時は勘忍袋の緒を切らした。一方、度重なる阿久津の悪どいやり方に重吉は盃を叩き返し、秀次郎の許に駆けつけた。ちょうど秀次郎は、ひとりで毆り込もうとする鳶政のひとり息子明夫を制し、自分で行こうとしていた。かわりに秀次郎と重吉が阿久津一家に毆り込んだ。二人は思う存分暴れ回り、たちまち修羅場と化したが、その中で重吉が三日仏に殺された。しかし、唐獅子牡丹の刺青を背に暴れる秀次郎に、阿久津も三日仏も倒されていった。

爵士之王

保羅·惠特曼,約翰·博爾斯,勞拉·拉普蘭特,珍妮特·洛夫,格倫·特萊昂,William Kent,斯利姆·薩默維爾,The Rhythm Boys,凱瑟琳·克勞福德,卡拉·萊姆勒,Stanley Smith,George Chiles,Jack White,Frank Leslie,沃爾特·布倫南,Churchill Ross,約翰·阿利奇,內爾·歐黛,Harry Barris,Bobbe Brox,Kathlyn Brox,Lorraine Brox,André Cheron,平·克勞斯貝,杰克·富爾頓

 這部在歌舞片發(fā)展早期拍攝的影片,堪稱是當時最為奢華的好萊塢巨制。影片由后來被譽為“爵士之王”的保羅·懷特曼領銜主演,還請到了一眾歌舞名手。片中的內容取自百老匯的經典演出,通過名家和管弦樂隊的出色演繹,為觀眾感受爵士年代風情提供了一次珍貴的機會。影片在當年獲得了奧斯卡最佳藝術指導獎。2013年,它還被美國國會圖書館列入國家電影目錄。

等待方舟

耶日·斯圖爾,克里斯提娜·楊達,卡里娜·謝魯斯克,馬里烏什·德莫霍夫斯基,馬雷克·瓦爾切夫斯基,揚·諾維茨基,亨里克·比斯塔,萊昂·涅姆奇克,克茲佐夫·馬扎克,斯坦尼斯瓦夫·伊加爾

  Set in an underground dungeon inhabited by bundled, ragged human beings, after the nuclear holocaust. The story follows the wanderings of a hero through the situations of survival. People wait for the Ark to arrive and rescue them while their habitat falls apart.  Delving deep into the dusty and long abandonded vaults of b-cinema in search of lost gems always leaves me with a bittersweet taste. On one hand the discovery of unexpected gems where no one would think them possible is a rewarding experience. On the other hand though it makes one wonder how many of these remarkable low-budget oddities, personal love affairs of directors never quite famous and now all but forgotten, have almost forever slipped from memory?  n any case what we have here is a little post-apocalyptic gem from Poland that is really better than it has any right to. The dystopian near future of O-BI, O-BA finds a group of survivors of the nuclear war that ravaged the Earth inhabiting an underworld concrete bunker and biding their time as they wait for the mysterious Ark, an air ship of some kind that will come and save them. The Ark proves to be an elaborate hoax, carefully designed to give hope to the malnourished and desperate denizens of the bunker, while in the meantime the dome that separates their miserable existence from the nuclear winter outside is slowly caving in.  What first striked me about the movie is the design of the bunker and the depiction of the survivors. The survivors are gaunt, filthy and terrible-looking penitents, dressed in rags and aimlessly wandering the neon-lit halls of the bunker like automatons. The bunker is a rundown, seedy place, with bright neon lights peering from all sides like the eyes of malignant beasts.  On one hand it is a slightly 80's depiction of the dystopian future but the movie never stoops down to MAD MAX cheese. Instead it combines biting political satire with the bleak outlook of a world with no future, black comedy with barbs on apathy, religion and power. The survivors, for example, are fed some kind of flour dropping from a tube that hovers in the air - later on we discover the food supervisor uses books and the Bible itself as filler for this meagre meal. There are many such short symbolic touches, perhaps not life-changing or faith-restoring, yet playful, clever and inspired.  One thing is for sure; O-BI, O-BA is not your run-of-the-mill sci-fi schlock. It overcomes its modest budget with creativity and has genuine artistic aspirations both from a writing and directing perspective. My opinion is that it should have been filmed in black and white instead of colour though. The director uses atmospheric light and shadow to great effect and it would have registered even better in stark black and white. The blue-green neon on the other hand outstays its welcome after a while. Just a minor gripe in an otherwise solid b-movie with its heart set in all the right places.  Imagine a less bleak THE ROAD (Cormac McCarthy) being injected with the satire and humour of DR.STRANGELOVE and you're getting there. See it if you can find it.